Goodsmoney+
Samira Kenawi's Full-Reserve Approach from the „Geld der Zukunft" Project
Full goods-coverage instead of asset purchases · Unwinding all financial markets in an orderly way · Lending money instead of capital income · Local say over credit decisions
💡 What if money were only ever allowed to be what it was invented for –
a medium of exchange and accounting for real output? Monetary researcher
and author Samira Kenawi proposed Goodsmoney
as one of eight solutions in the
„Geld der Zukunft" project: money creation fully coupled to real
goods-value creation, combined with the orderly wind-down of capital,
currency and stock markets.
This page is a deliberate contrast to
HME / RICH,
the system-change concept presented on cibwal.com.
Both approaches are root reforms – they don't merely
improve the existing FIAT monetary system but fundamentally change its
construction. That makes an honest comparison of where
they actually differ all the more important.
🎓 The Author
💡
Samira Kenawi is a monetary researcher and author. She
contributed to the documentary Oeconomia; the fourth and final
volume of her main work „Die Quadratur des Geldes" ("The
Squaring of Money") was published in 2023 and lays out a comprehensive
plan for solving monetary problems, building on the analysis of the
origin and workings of today's money set out in volumes 2 and 3.
🔗
The Goodsmoney concept is one of eight solutions in the
curated project
„Geld der Zukunft" – democratic, sustainable, fair. This page
documents Kenawi's contribution fairly and closely follows her own
word-for-word presentation, not as a refutation but as an independent
voice in the spectrum of monetary reform concepts.
🧠 The Core Argument
All money is at all times fully backed by
goods values. Banks create money exclusively to enable real
goods production and wage payments – not by purchasing assets. Money
supply and goods-value creation grow and shrink in lockstep.
🏦
Money creation: still through democratic, decentralised,
state-supervised private banks – as credit money created at the click of
a mouse, but strictly coupled to goods-value creation.
🧾
Credit & interest: money remains credit money. In
periods where the real economy's credit demand exceeds society's total
savings volume, positive savings interest is paid. But because private
money holding stays permanently coupled to private consumption spending,
no compound interest can arise – balances cannot grow
without limit given the finite nature of real consumption needs.
📉
Financial markets: capital, currency and stock markets
are wound down entirely in an orderly way, since they
serve no necessary function. Capital raising for companies happens fully
through banks, risk cover fully through insurance. An international
clearing bank in the spirit of Keynes' clearing union
also makes currency trading unnecessary – money for international trade
arises through the settlement of trade transactions.
💰
Capital accumulation: apart from occasional savings
interest, there are neither dividends nor capital gains – no capital
income from money holdings at all. Modifying property rights is meant
to make capital income from real assets impossible too. Equity capital
then brings no market advantage and no longer needs to be accumulated.
🏛
Central bank: becomes a clearing house. Today's
two-tier banking system becomes a single-tier one: the clearing house
supervises money creation by goods-money banks and lending by savings
banks, manages every institution's risk reserves, and oversees the
coupling of money supply to goods value.
🗳
Democratic control on the ground: decentralised,
democratically controlled goods-money banks give local communities
direct say over credit decisions – allowing social and ecological
criteria to be agreed and enforced locally.
🏘
Property: is reduced to its original dimension –
possession. By merging possession and property rights again, every claim
to a return on capital ownership (ownership without an accompanying duty
of possession) disappears – explicitly including real assets such as
land and real estate, not only financial assets.
🌍
Reference theories: feminist economics, Keynesianism and
the Keynes Plan, Henry George's single tax, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's
people's/exchange bank, John Maynard Keynes' clearing currency, and
Silvio Gesell's demurrage money. Target picture: steady-state economy /
post-growth society, full employment, no land or real-estate
speculation, balanced current accounts.
❓ Goods or Services Too?
Kenawi explicitly defines money as a medium of exchange and accounting
for real value – "goods and services". In the actual
coverage mechanism, however, she consistently uses the term "goods
values". This reads most plausibly as a collective term
for real economic output as a whole – similar to how a "basket of
goods" in inflation statistics also includes services – and places her
terminologically within the established commodity theory of
money (as opposed to chartalism / credit theory of money). A
definitive clarification would require consulting Kenawi's four-volume
main work.
🔀 Two Root Reforms Compared
Goodsmoney+ and HME/RICH are closer to each other than any other concept
on this site: both structurally eliminate compound interest and
speculation, both call for an international clearing solution. The
differences lie in the backing mechanism and
the path taken on property rights.
⚖️
Backing mechanism: Kenawi relies on
full-reserve / 100% goods-coverage – money is created
and extinguished in lockstep with goods-value creation. RICH relies on
Silvio Gesell's circulation-securing money (demurrage /
negative holding costs) as its value-storage mechanism. Both prevent
compound interest – by different routes.
🏠
Property – two very different paths: Kenawi reforms
property rights directly: ownership is reduced to possession, capital
income from real assets (land, real estate) is made impossible by
changing the law itself.
RICH deliberately takes a different route without a new law of land ownership: wealth is regulated through value-storage certificates, which must always carry real-economy backing – not through balance mechanics. In addition, high taxes on unearned income are levied: on rents, leases, the sale of real assets, real estate and land, and on inheritance. The goal – no unlimited capital income from mere possession – is similar in both concepts; the route there differs fundamentally: Kenawi changes property law itself, RICH steers through mandatory backing and taxation.
RICH deliberately takes a different route without a new law of land ownership: wealth is regulated through value-storage certificates, which must always carry real-economy backing – not through balance mechanics. In addition, high taxes on unearned income are levied: on rents, leases, the sale of real assets, real estate and land, and on inheritance. The goal – no unlimited capital income from mere possession – is similar in both concepts; the route there differs fundamentally: Kenawi changes property law itself, RICH steers through mandatory backing and taxation.
📈
Financial markets: Kenawi winds down capital, currency
and stock markets entirely. Under RICH, shares generally remain –
the lever there sits more with heavy taxation of unearned gains
(60–70%) than with abolishing the market itself.
Historically, Kenawi's approach sits close to the full-reserve /
100% money tradition (Chicago Plan, Irving Fisher, Positive Money),
combined with Keynes' clearing-union idea at the
international level – an independent, nameable school of thought within
the spectrum of monetary reform.
📚 Further Resources
Warengeld – the solution in detail
geld-der-zukunft.org
Video Talk
Samira Kenawi on YouTube
geldtheorie.net
Samira Kenawi's website
History of Money
geldtheorie.net
Oeconomia
Documentary · kinofenster.de
Kapitalismus: Prinzip und Ausweg
matriforum.com
🔀 Further Perspectives in Comparison
The spectrum of monetary and social reform reaches well beyond
Goodsmoney. Four further pages on cibwal.com explore other paths –
likewise in honest comparison with HME/RICH.
🔀 MMT & Post-Keynesianism
Ehnts, Sahr and Flassbeck apply the lever to fiscal policy and demand
management – the debt-money mechanism itself remains in place.
🏛 Austrian School & Neoliberalism
Hayek, Mises and Friedman see the state, not the monetary system, as
the main problem – a completely different starting point than Kenawi's.
🌿 Social Threefolding – Steiner & Caspar
Not an alternative in the narrow sense, but a societal development
that reaches far beyond monetary architecture.
🧮 Balance Mechanics+ – Credit Tax (Buschbeck)
Solves the problem from within: capitalism, capital markets and
private interest-bearing money remain structurally in place – unlike
with Kenawi.
MMT & Post-Keynesianism
Improving FIAT rather than replacing it – comparison with HME/RICH
Austrian School & Neoliberalism
Hayek · Mises · Friedman – strengths & comparison with HME/RICH
Social Threefolding – Steiner & Caspar
Freedom · Equality · Brotherhood – complement to HME/RICH
Balance Mechanics & Credit Tax
Buschbeck – credit tax instead of savings interest, comparison with HME/RICH